 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 denotes the Lie algebra of strictly upper triangular
matrices. In this subsection we denote by
 denotes the Lie algebra of strictly upper triangular
matrices. In this subsection we denote by  the elementary matrices.
(as we have done so without even mentioning...)
 the elementary matrices.
(as we have done so without even mentioning...)
 be a field of characteristic
 be a field of characteristic  (possibly 0
). 
Let
 (possibly 0
). 
Let 
 .
We assume that
.
We assume that 
 .
Then we have
.
Then we have
![$\displaystyle \{x \in \mathfrak{gl}_n(k) ; [x,y]\in k.1_n \quad(\forall y\in \mathfrak{n}_n(k))\}
=k.1_n+k. e_{1 n}.
$](img265.png) 
 the left hand side of the lemma.
Then we trivially have
 the left hand side of the lemma.
Then we trivially have 
 .
Furthermore, for all
.
Furthermore, for all 
 , we see easily that
, we see easily that
 
holds. So we have
 
Let us prove the opposite inclusion.
We take an arbitrary element  .
.
For any  satisfying
 satisfying  , 
we have
, 
we have 
 and thus
 and thus
![$\displaystyle [e_{i,j}, x]=c 1_n \qquad (\exists c \in k).
$](img274.png) 
The rank of the left hand side is at most
 . So
. So  must be equal to 0
when
 must be equal to 0
when  . 
Otherwise (
. 
Otherwise ( ), we compare the trace of the both
hand sides. The trace of the left hand side is clearly zero. 
The trace of a scalar matrix
), we compare the trace of the both
hand sides. The trace of the left hand side is clearly zero. 
The trace of a scalar matrix  is equal to
 is equal to  . Thus
. Thus  by our assumption (
 
by our assumption (
 ).
In either case, we have
).
In either case, we have 
![$ [e_{i,j},x]=0$](img282.png) .
Then we compute some of special cases.
First, let us examine the case where
.
Then we compute some of special cases.
First, let us examine the case where 
 . Then
. Then
| ![$\displaystyle 0=[e_{1 j}, x]= \sum_{s t} [e_{1 j}, x_{s t} e_{s t}] = \sum_{t } x_{j t} e_{1 t} -\sum_s x_{s 1} e_{s j}$](img284.png) | 
 entry of the above equation,
 we conclude that  equations in entries
 entry of the above equation,
 we conclude that  equations in entries
|  | ||
|  | 
 entry of
 entry of 
![$ [e_{i n},x]$](img289.png) ,
we conclude that equations
,
we conclude that equations
 
hold. Putting the equations all together, we conclude that
 is in the right
hand side of the lemma.
 is in the right
hand side of the lemma.  
  
As an application of the Engel's theorem, we prove the following proposition.
 be a field of characteristic
 be a field of characteristic  (possibly 0
). 
Let
 (possibly 0
). 
Let  be a positive integer. 
We assume that
 be a positive integer. 
We assume that 
 .
Then each ideal
.
Then each ideal  of
 of 
 is equal to the one in the following list.
 is equal to the one in the following list.
 .
.
 .
.
 .
.
 is trivial. So let us assume
 is trivial. So let us assume  .
.
If 
 , then
, then 
 and hence
 and hence  or
 or  . 
Assume now
. 
Assume now 
 .
Let us consider the Lie algebra
.
Let us consider the Lie algebra  
 of strictly upper triangular matrices.
Then
 
 of strictly upper triangular matrices.
Then 
 
satisfies the assumption of the Engel's theorem. So there exists a non-constant element
 such that
 such that 
![$\displaystyle [x,y]\in k.1_n \qquad (\forall y\in \mathfrak{n}_n(k)).
$](img304.png) 
holds. By using the previous lemma, we see that
 may be presented as
 may be presented as
 
Since
 is non-constant, we have
 is non-constant, we have  .
.
![$\displaystyle I \ni [e_{11},x]=c_1 e_{1 n}
$](img307.png) 
Thus
 belongs to
 belongs to  . 
By changing the order of the base and repeating the
above argument, we conclude that
. 
By changing the order of the base and repeating the
above argument, we conclude that
 
In addition we have
![$\displaystyle I \ni [e_{i j},e_{j i}] =e_{ii}-e_{j j}
$](img310.png) 
This clearly proves
 .
Since the codimension of
.
Since the codimension of 
 in
 in 
 is
 is  , we have
either
, we have
either 
 or
 or 
 .
.
  
For the sake of completeness, we deal with the case 
 .
In this case, situation is a bit different.
.
In this case, situation is a bit different.
 be a field of characteristic
 be a field of characteristic  . 
Then:
. 
Then:
 of
 
of 
 with
 with 
 is equal to a vector space
is equal to a vector space
 ![$ L_{[b:c]}$](img317.png) given by an element
 given by an element 
![$ [b:c]\in \mathbb{P}^1(k)$](img318.png) which is defined as
which is defined as 
![$\displaystyle L_{[b:c]}
=k. 1_n + k.
\begin{pmatrix}
0& b \\
c & 0
\end{pmatrix}.
$](img319.png) 
![$ [b:c]\in \mathbb{P}^1(k)$](img318.png) , the vector space
, the vector space ![$ L_{[b:c]}$](img317.png) is an ideal of
is an ideal of 
 .
.
 is an ideal of
 is an ideal of 
 .
.
 such 
that
 such 
that 
 
holds. By subtracting a constant matrix, one may easily replace
 by a matrix
with zero diagonals.
 by a matrix
with zero diagonals. 
(2) By a direct computation we see
 
(Note that
 .)
.)
(3) 
![$ \mathfrak{t}_2(k)=L_{[1:0]}$](img326.png) .
.
  
 be a field of characteristic
 be a field of characteristic  . Then each ideal
. Then each ideal  of
 
of 
 is equal 
to the one in the following list.
 is equal 
to the one in the following list.
 .
.
![$ L_{[b:c]}$](img317.png) defined as in the lemma above.
 defined as in the lemma above.
 .
.
 .
.
(i)
Case where 
 .
In this case there exists an element
.
In this case there exists an element  with
 with 
 .
Putting
.
Putting
 
we compute as follows
![$\displaystyle I\ni
[e_{1 2}, x]
=\left[
\begin{pmatrix}
0& 1 \\
0 & 0
\end{pm...
...
c & d
\end{pmatrix}\right]
=
\begin{pmatrix}
c& a+d \\
0 & c
\end{pmatrix}.
$](img330.png) 
(Note
 .)
Then we have
.)
Then we have
![$\displaystyle I \ni
[e_{1 1},[e_{1 2},x]]
=
\left[
\begin{pmatrix}
1& 0 \\
0 &...
...\\
0 & c
\end{pmatrix}\right]
=
\begin{pmatrix}
0& a+d \\
0 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$](img332.png) 
Thus we see that
 .
In a same way (by changing the order of the base), we obtain,
.
In a same way (by changing the order of the base), we obtain,
 .
.
![$\displaystyle 1_2=[e_{2 1},e_{1 2}]\in I.
$](img335.png) 
Since
 , we see that
, we see that 
 spans the
 spans the
 .
thus
.
thus 
 in this case.
 in this case.
(ii)
Case where 
 and
 and 
 .
Let
.
Let  be arbitrary element of
 be arbitrary element of  and put
 and put 
 
Then by computing
![$ [e_{1 2},x]$](img341.png) as 
in the case (i) above, we know that
 as 
in the case (i) above, we know that   . Similarly, we know
. Similarly, we know  .
Since
.
Since  is traceless,
 is traceless,  also holds. 
So the only possibility in this case is
 also holds. 
So the only possibility in this case is  .
.
(iii)
Case where 
 .
By a dimension consideration, we see that
.
By a dimension consideration, we see that  .
Then we use the above lemma.
.
Then we use the above lemma.
(iv)
The case  or
 or 
 .
Excellent. There is nothing to in this case.
.
Excellent. There is nothing to in this case.
  
 
 
 
 
