 
 
 
 
 
   
 ,
, 
 , and the ring of Witt vectors
, and the ring of Witt vectorsYoshifumi Tsuchimoto
No.03: 
 
 is said to be directed if 
for all
 is said to be directed if 
for all 
 there exists
 there exists 
 such that
 such that  and
 and  .
.
 be a directed set.
Let
 be a directed set.
Let 
 be a family of topological rings.
Assume we  are given for each pair of elements
 be a family of topological rings.
Assume we  are given for each pair of elements 
 such that
 
such that 
 ,
a continuous homomorphisms
,
a continuous homomorphisms
 
We say that such a system
 is
a projective system of topological rings
 if it satisfies the following axioms.
 is
a projective system of topological rings
 if it satisfies the following axioms.
 (
 
    (
 such that
 
such that 
 ).
). 
 (
     (
 ).
).
 be a projective system of 
topological rings. Then we say that a projective limit
 
be a projective system of 
topological rings. Then we say that a projective limit 
 of
 of
 is given if
 is given if
 is a topological ring.
 is a topological ring.
 is a continuous homomorphism.
 is a continuous homomorphism.
 for
 
for 
 such that
 such that 
 .)
.)
 is a universal object among objects which satisfy (1)-(3).
 is a universal object among objects which satisfy (1)-(3). 
The ``universal'' here means the following:
If 
 satisfies
 satisfies 
 is a topological ring.
 is a topological ring.
 is a continuous homomorphism.
 is a continuous homomorphism.
 for
 
for 
 such that
 such that 
 .)
.)
 
such that
 
 of topological rings, 
We denote the projective limit of it by
 of topological rings, 
We denote the projective limit of it by
 
Note: projective limits of systems of topological spaces, rings, groups, modules, and so on, are defined in a similar manner.
 
as a topological ring.
 is a compact space.
 is a compact space.
Note: 
There are several ways to prove the result of the above corollary.
For example,
the ring 
 with the metric
 with the metric  is easily shown to be totally bounded.
 is easily shown to be totally bounded.
 is expressed uniquely as
 is expressed uniquely as
![% latex2html id marker 765
$\displaystyle [0.a_1a_2a_3a_4\dots]_p \qquad(a_i\in \{0,1,\dots,p-1\} \quad(i=1,2,3,\dots)).
$](img38.png) 
 invertible in
 invertible in 
 ?
(Hint:  use formal expansion
?
(Hint:  use formal expansion
 
is it possible to write down a correct proof to see that the result is true?)
 
 
 
 
