be an element of a commutative ring
. Then we define the
localization
of
with respect to
as a ring defined by
is a indeterminate.
, the residue class of
plays the role of the
inverse of
. Therefore, we may write
instead of
if there is no confusion.
One may define localization in much more general situation. The reader is advised to read standard books on commutative algebras.
be an element of a commutative ring
.
Then there is a canonically defined homeomorphism
between
and
.
(It is usual to identify these two via this homeomorphism.)
be the natural homomorphism.
We have already seen that we have a continuous map
and
.
Let us do this by considering representations.
corresponds to a representation
.
corresponds to a representation
.
corresponds to a restriction map
.
Now, for any
,
extends to
if and only if the image
of
is invertible, that means,
.
In such a case, the extension is unique.
(We recall the fact that the inverse of an element of
a field is unique.)
It is easy to prove that
is a homeomorphism.
Let
be a ring. Let
.
It is important to note that each element of
is written as a
“fraction”
as a set of such formal fractions
which satisfy ordinary computation rules.
In precise, we have the following Lemma.
be a ring,
be its element.
We consider the following set
the following equivalence law.
by introducing
the following sum and product.
the equivalence class of
.
Likewise, for any
-module
, we may define
as
a set of formal fractions