 
 
 
 
 
   
Namely, let 
 be affine schemes.
Assume that morphisms
 be affine schemes.
Assume that morphisms  and
 and  are given. Then 
we have
 are given. Then 
we have
 
(If the morphisms and homomorphisms involved are clear from the context, we often abbreviate the above equation as:
 
by the abuse of language.)
So far, we have not developed enough theory of a general schemes except for the affine case. In local theories, the affine case suffices and the generalization to general schemes is fairly easy. Due to the lack of time, we omit detailed arguments. For more detailed account, see EGA or Iitaka [11]
Note that the universality of the fiber product may be interpreted as the following way.
 be a category. Let
 be a category. Let 
 ,
, 
 .
Assume that the fiber product
.
Assume that the fiber product 
 exists.
Then we have
 exists.
Then we have
 
 be schemes. Let
 be schemes. Let 
 be morphisms.
Then we have
 be morphisms.
Then we have
 
for any field
 . (Recall that for a scheme
. (Recall that for a scheme  ,
,  denotes the
set of
 denotes the
set of  -valued points of
-valued points of  .)
.)
 
 
 
 
