on an affine schemes are “too good”. Namely,
in terms of cohomology (which we study later,) we have always
if
So to study some important problems on sheaf theory (which we will sure to encounter when we deal with non-affine schemes,) we need to study some examples from other mathematical areas.
A first example is a presheaf which satisfies the “locality” of sheaf axiom, but which fails to obey “gluing lemma”.
be the (usual) real line with the usual Lebesgue measure.
Then we have a presheaf of
-functions given by
is integrable
is a presheaf which satisfies the “locality” of sheaf axiom,
but which fails to obey “gluing lemma”.
Indeed, Let
be an open covering of
and define
a section
on
by
is a family of sections which satisfies
the assumption of “gluing lemma”. The function which should
appear as the “glued function” is the constant function
, which
fails to be integrable on the whole of
.
We may “sheaficate” the presheaf
above.
Instead of
-functions we consider functions which are locally
.
Namely, for any open subset
, we consider
-functions”.
Bdd
of bounded functions on a topological
space
. We may sheaficate this example and the sheaf so created is
the sheaf of locally bounded functions.
For any differentiable (
) manifold
(students
which are not familiar with the manifolds may take
as an open
subset of
for an example.),
we define a presheaf
on
defined as follows
complex valued $C^&infin#infty;$-functions on $U×U$
To sheaficate this, we first need to introduce an equivalence relation on
.
Then we define
so defined
is a sheaf.
(Readers who are familiar with the theory of jets may notice that
the sheaf is related to the sheaf of jets. In other words, there is a
sheaf homomorphism from this sheaf to the sheaf of jets.)